Bush
Nuclear Policy Violates
International Law. Again.
By
Francis Boyle
Human Rights lawyer and a professor of law at the
University of Illinois
April 2, 2002
Writing in the March 10, 2002 edition of the Los
Angeles Times, defense analyst William Arkin revealed the
leaked contents of the Bush Jr. administration's Nuclear
Posture Review (NPR) that it had just transmitted to
Congress on January 8.
The Bush Jr. administration has ordered the Pentagon
to draw up war plans for the first-use of nuclear weapons
against seven states: the so-called "axis of evil": Iran,
Iraq, and North Korea; Libya and Syria; Russia and China,
which are nuclear armed.
This component of the Bush Jr. NPR incorporates the
Clinton administration's 1997 nuclear war-fighting plans
against so-called "rogue states" set forth in
Presidential Decision Directive 60.
These warmed-over nuclear war plans targeting these
five non-nuclear states expressly violate the so-called
"negative security assurances" given by the United States
as an express condition for the renewal and indefinite
extension of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)
by all of its non-nuclear weapons states parties in 1995.
Yet this new NPR has delivered yet another serious blow
to the integrity of the entire NPT Regime.
Equally reprehensible from a legal perspective is the
NPR's call for the Pentagon to draft nuclear war-fighting
plans for first nuclear strikes:
* against alleged nuclear/chemical/biological
"materials" or "facilities";
* "against targets able to withstand non-nuclear
attack";
* and "in the event of surprising military developments,"
whatever that means.
According to the NPR, the Pentagon must also draw up
nuclear war-fighting plans to intervene with nuclear
weapons in wars:
* between China and Taiwan;
* between Israel and the Arab states;
* between Israel and Iraq;
* and between North Korea and South Korea.
It is obvious upon whose side the United States will
actually plan to intervene with the first-use nuclear
weapons. Quite ominously, today the Bush Jr.
administration accelerates its plans for launching an
apocalyptic military aggression against Iraq,
deliberately raising the spectre of a U.S. first-strike
nuclear attack.
The Bush Jr. administration is making it crystal clear
to all its chosen adversaries around the world that it is
fully prepared to cross the threshold of actually using
nuclear weapons that has prevailed since the U.S.
criminal bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.
Yet more proof of the fact that the United States
government has abandoned "deterrence" for "compellance"
in order to rule the future world of the Third
Millenium.
The Bush Jr. administration has obviously become a
"threat to the peace" within the meaning of U.N. Charter
article 39. It must be countermanded by the U.N. Security
Council acting under Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter. In
the event of a U.S veto of such "enforcement action" by
the Security Council, then the U.N. General Assembly must
deal with the Bush Jr. administration by invoking its
Uniting for Peace Resolution of 1950.
There very well could be some itty-bitty "rogue
states" lurking out there somewhere in the Third World.
But today the United States government has become the
sole "rogue elephant" of international law and politics.
For the good of all humanity America must be restrained.
Time is of the essence!
Francis Boyle is human rights lawyer and a
professor of law at the University of Illinois. He is the
author of The
Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence, recently
published by ClarityPress.
He can be reached at: FBOYLE@LAW.UIUC.EDU
Francis
Boyle - The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence (USA
edition)
Francis
Boyle - The Criminality of Nuclear Deterrence
(UK edition)
©
TFF and the
author
Tell a friend about this article
Send to:
From:
Message and your name
|