Internal
Documents from Germany's Foreign Office Regarding
Pre-Bombardment
Genocide in Kosovo
Collected by International
Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms,
IALANA
1. Opinion of the Upper Administrative Court at
Mnster, March 11, 1999 (Az: 13A 3894/94.A):
"Ethnic Albanians in Kosovo have neither been nor are
now exposed to regional or countrywide group persecution in
the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia."
2. Opinion of the Bavarian Administrative Court,
October 29, 1998 (Az: 22 BA 94.34252):
"The Foreign Office's status reports of May 6, June 8
and July 13, 1998, given to the plaintiffs in the summons to
a verbal deliberation, do not allow the conclusion that
there is group persecution of ethnic Albanians from Kosovo.
Not even regional group persecution, applied to all ethnic
Albanians from a specific part of Kosovo, can be observed
with sufficient certainty. The violent actions of the
Yugoslav military and police since February 1998 were aimed
at separatist activities and are no proof of a persecution
of the whole Albanian ethnic group in Kosovo or in a part of
it. What was involved in the Yugoslav violent actions and
excesses since February 1998 was a selective forcible action
against the military underground movement (especially the
KLA) and people in immediate contact with it in its areas of
operation. ...A state program or persecution aimed at the
whole ethnic group of Albanians exists neither now nor
earlier."
3. Intelligence report from the Foreign Office,
January 12, 1999 to the Administrative Court of Trier (Az:
514-516.80/32 426):
"Even in Kosovo an explicit political persecution linked
to Albanian ethnicity is not verifiable. The East of Kosovo
is still not involved in armed conflict. Public life in
cities like Pristina, Urosevac, Gnjilan, etc. has, in the
entire conflict period, continued on a relatively normal
basis." The "actions of the security forces (were) not
directed against the Kosovo-Albanians as an ethnically
defined group, but against the military opponent and its
actual or alleged supporters."
4. Intelligence report from the Foreign Office January
6, 1999 to the Bavarian Administrative Court, Ansbach:
"At this time, an increasing tendency is observable
inside the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia of refugees
returning to their dwellings. ... Regardless of the desolate
economic situation in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
(according to official information of the Federal Republic
of Yugoslavia 700,000 refugees from Croatia, Bosnia and
Herzogovina have found lodging since 1991), no cases of
chronic malnutrition or insufficient medical treatment among
the refugees are known and significant homelessness has not
been observed. ... According to the Foreign Office's
assessment, individual Kosovo-Albanians (and their immediate
families) still have limited possibilities of settling in
those parts of Yugoslavia in which their countrymen or
friends already live and who are ready to take them in and
support them."
5. Report of the Foreign Office March 15, 1999 (Az:
514-516,80/33841) to the Administrative Court, Mainz:
"As laid out in the status report of November 18, 1998,
the KLA has resumed its positions after the partial
withdrawal of the (Serbian) security forces in October 1998,
so it once again controls broad areas in the zone of
conflict. Before the beginning of spring 1999 there were
still clashes between the KLA and security forces, although
these have not until now reached the intensity of the
battles of spring and summer 1998."
6. Opinion of the Administrative Court of
Baden-Wrttemberg, February 4, 1999 (Az: A 14 S
22276/98):
"The various reports presented to the senate all agree
that the often feared humanitarian catastrophe threatening
the Albanian civil population has been averted. ... This
appears to be the case since the winding down of combat in
connection with an agreement made with the Serbian
leadership at the end of 1998 (Status Report of the Foreign
Office, November 18, 1998). Since that time both the
security situation and the conditions of life of the
Albanian-derived population have noticeably improved. ...
Specifically in the larger cities public life has since
returned to relative normality (cf. on this Foreign Office,
January 12, 1999 to the Administrative Court of Trier;
December 28, 1998 to the Upper Administrative Court of
Lneberg and December 23, 1998 to the Administrative Court at
Kassel), even though tensions between the population groups
have meanwhile increased due to individual acts of
violence... Single instances of excessive acts of violence
against the civil population, e.g. in Racak, have, in world
opinion, been laid at the feet of the Serbian side and have
aroused great indignation. But the number and frequency of
such excesses do not warrant the conclusion that every
Albanian living in Kosovo is exposed to extreme danger to
life and limb nor is everyone who returns there threatened
with death and severe injury."
7. Opinion of the Upper Administrative Court at
Mnster, February 24, 1999 (Az: 14 A 3840/94,A):
"There is no sufficient actual proof of a secret
program, or an unspoken consensus on the Serbian side, to
liquidate the Albanian people, to drive it out or otherwise
to persecute it in the extrememanner presently described.
... If Serbian state power carries out its laws and in so
doing necessarily puts pressure on an Albanian ethnic group
which turns its back on the state and is for supporting a
boycott, then the objective direction of these measures is
not that of a programmatic persecution of this population
group ...Even if the Serbian state were benevolently to
accept or even to intend that a part of the citizenry which
sees itself in a hopeless situation or opposescompulsory
measures, should emigrate, this still does not represent a
program of persecution aimed at the whole of the Albanian
majority (in Kosovo)."
"If moreover the (Yugoslav) state reacts to separatist
strivings with consistent and harsh execution of its laws
and with anti-separatist measures, and if some of those
involved decide to go abroad as a result, this is still not
a deliberate policy of the (Yugoslav) state aiming at
ostracizing and expelling the minority; on the contrary it
is directed toward keeping this people within the state
federation."
"Events since February and March 1998 do not evidence a
persecution program based on Albanian ethnicity. The
measures taken by the armed Serbian forces are in the first
instance directed toward combatting the KLA and its supposed
adherents and supporters."
Notes
As in the case of the Clinton Administration, the present
regime in Germany, specifically Joschka Fischer's Foreign
Office, has justified its intervention in Kosovo by pointing
to a "humanitarian catastrophe," "genocide" and "ethnic
cleansing" occurring there, especially in the months
immediately preceding the NATO attack.
The above internal documents from Fischer's ministry and
from various regional Administrative Courts in Germany
spanning the year before the start of NATO's air attacks,
attest that criteria of ethnic cleansing and genocide were
not met.
The Foreign Office documents were responses to the
courts' needs in deciding the status of Kosovo-Albanian
refugees in Germany. Although one might in these cases
suppose a bias in favor of downplaying a humanitarian
catastrophe in order to limit refugees, it nevertheless
remains highly significant that the Foreign Office, in
contrast to its public assertion of ethnic cleansing and
genocide in justifying NATO intervention, privately
continued to deny their existence as Yugoslav policy in this
crucial period. And this continued to be their assessment
even in March of this year. Thus these documents tend to
show that stopping genocide was not the reason the German
government, and by implication NATO, intervened in Kosovo,
and that genocide (as understood in German and international
law) in Kosovo did not March, 1999, but is a product of
it.
Sources
Excerpts from the these official documents were obtained
by IALANA (International Association of Lawyers Against
Nuclear Arms) which sent them to various media. The texts
used here were published in the German daily Junge Welt on
April 24, 1999. See
http://www.jungewelt.de/1999/04-24/011.shtml as well as the
commentary at
http://www.jungewelt.de/1999/04-24/001.shtml).
This seems to be as complete a reproduction of the documents
as exists in the German media at the time of this
writing.
© Junge Welt 1999
|