TFF logoFEATURES
NEWPRESSINFOTFFFORUMSFEATURESPUBLICATIONSKALEJDOSKOPLINKS



 

The Guardian May 26 1999

Outside Natoland, the situation about the war is extremely serious. The Ukraine was the only country in the world to renounce nuclear weapons and unilaterally disarm. A few weeks ago its parliament voted unanimously to revert to its former nuclear status. The deputies claimed that they had foolishly believed the United States when it had promised a new norm-based and inclusive security system. Nato's war on Yugoslavia had destroyed all their illusions.

If Kiev is angry, Moscow is incandescent. The military-industrial complex is one of the best-preserved institutions in the country. Its leaders have been arguing with the politicians for nearly two years, pleading that they be allowed to upgrade Russia's nuclear armoury.

Until March 24 this year they had not made too much headway. On April 30, a meeting of the National Security Council in Moscow approved the modernisation of all strategic and tactical nuclear warheads. It gave the green light to the development and manufacture of strategic low-yield nuclear missiles capable of pin-point strikes anywhere in the world. Simultaneously the defence ministry authorised a change in nuclear doctrine.

First use is no longer excluded.

In the space of several weeks, Javier Solana and Robin Cook, former members of European Nuclear Disarmament, have re-ignited the nuclear flame. In Beijing, too, the bombing of the Chinese embassy has resulted in a shift away from the no-first-strike principle. The Chinese refuse to accept that the bombing of their embassy was an accident. They believe that it was a Machiavellian ploy by the war-party in Washington to sabotage any peace plan by ensuring a hard-line Chinese veto at the UN. There are also indications that Moscow and Beijing are discussing new security arrangements. The bombs on Belgrade may well come to be seen as the first shots of a new cold war.

The real tragedy is that the Kosovo for which Nato supposedly went to war in March no longer exists. Its cities and villages are being bombed to smithereens by Nato. Its population is being pushed out by Milosevic. Even if some of the refugees were to return, a significant proportion, the very people whose talents would be needed to rebuild the region, will probablynever go back. Refugees rarely do. Only 10% returned to Bosnia.

The scale of disaster is now clearly visible. Every day, as the bombs fall, the situation gets worse. With the exception of Britain, EU countries are pushing for a negotiated settlement, aware that it is the only viablesolution.

It could have been achieved some months ago if the US had not insisted on a Nato peacekeeping force. The New York Times, writing as recently as April 8 1999 on the failed Rambouillet negotiations, said: "In a little-noted resolution of the Serbian parliament just before the bombing, when that hardly independent body rejected Nato troops in Kosovo, it also supported the idea of UN forces to monitor a political settlement there."

In other words this war has been fought not so much for the safety of the Kosovans, but to assert Nato hegemony and it is now indisputable that it turned out to be a grave miscalculation. Natoland is seriously divided. The isolation of the war party led by Madeleine Albright and Sandy Berger in Washington (and supported by Blair and Cook in London) is almost complete.The German chancellor has ruled out his country's involvement in any escalation of the war. The Italian prime minister has excluded the use of Italian soldiers in any Nato operation on the ground unless expressly sanctioned by the UN and backed by Russia and China. The Greek foreign minister has made it clear in public that if Nato sent in troops it would be impossible to use Salonika as a point of landing. In private he has warned that a popular revolt could topple his government if it were to acquiesce in any such plan. The Hungarian, Czech and Polish governments, blushing new brides at Nato's altar, are now pale-faced and nervous, wondering whether they will survive the war. They had married Nato because of the generous dowries that might follow. The rude honeymoon has shocked them.

The French, too, are slowly moving in the German direction and even General Sir Michael Jackson, the British commander in Macedonia has told eight different interviewers on radio and television that: "We will not go in unless there is an agreement."

New Labour's hands are already stained with the blood of innocents. Time to call off the dogs of war and seek the help of non-Nato powers to resolve the conflict.

 

© Copyright Guardian Media Group plc. 1999


Home

New

PressInfo

TFF

Forums

Features

Publications

Kalejdoskop

Links



 

The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research
Vegagatan 25, S - 224 57 Lund, Sweden
Phone + 46 - 46 - 145909     Fax + 46 - 46 - 144512
http://www.transnational.org   E-mail: tff@transnational.org

Contact the Webmaster at: comments@transnational.org
Created by Maria Näslund      © 1997, 1998, 1999 TFF