High food prices could
help the very poor
By
Jonathan
Power
TFF
Associate since 1991
Comments directly to
JonatPower@aol.com
November 8, 2007
LONDON - Most of the world’s poor live in the rural backwaters of Africa, Asia and Latin America. Most of them are small farmers or landless farm workers. The overwhelming majority of them are starting to benefit from the present rise in global food prices. They would benefit even more if governments would allow markets to do their job. China for example, long ago in Maoist times the friend of the peasant, controls food prices to keep its city people happy
Yet the cacophony of apparently “informed opinion” now giving vent is loudly moaning about food price rises. “There is a sense of panic,” says Abdolreza Abbassian, secretary of the grains trading group at the UN’s Food and Agricultural Organisation. “The first global food shortage since the 1970s”, headlines the Financial Times. In Russia, price controls on basic foodstuffs have been imposed. The European Union has suspended its “set-aside” rules that ban farmers from planting cereals on 10% of their land.
This is economics as paranoia. The truth is this is a long overdue correction in the terms of trade, whereby the urban minority of the world, whether they be shanty town dwellers in Nigeria’s Lagos or Parisian consumers of Danone’s yoghurt whose prices have just been raised by 10%, have long been subsidised by the poorest of the poor- those left behind in the remote reaches of the countryside, where there is little investment, few schools or health clinics, and only rutted roads and battered trucks to link their produce to the market place.
We should feel a bit less pity for these urban consumers. The majority of slum residents of Lagos, Shanghai, Rio de Janeiro or Bombay live longer and in better health than their rural compatriots. Their governments spend far more per head on them than they do on the small farmers and landless. Only 4% of foreign aid, according to the World Bank’s latest report, goes to the rural poor.
Belatedly last month the World Bank has decided that improving economic growth in rural areas is by far the best way of reducing poverty among the world’s poorest people. What fortuitous timing- the market, in pushing up agricultural prices, is doing much of the job for it!
At least one UN agency, the International Fund for Agricultural Development, sees the picture clearly. Its remit has always been the small farmer. Shantanu Mathur , a senior official, tells me that his organisation now “feels much happier than when food prices were going down”, as they have for the last three decades. “I believe the international community should take advantage of this rise to invest in good projects in the rural backwaters.”
Mathur singles out two opportunities in particular. The first is the niche market of organic produce. More and more Third World farmers are being trained to take advantage of this. “It is very responsive to prices”, he says. The second is bio fuels. Mathur punctures another myth. “Bio fuels don’t have to be a trade off between food and fuel. It is the stalks that make the fuel. The grain on the plant can be used for food”.
History repeats itself- the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce- and too quickly too, as memories seems to shorten. The last time there was a sudden, and massive, jump in food prices was 1974. The U.S. Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, called for a World Food Conference. The Conference was duly held in Rome and declared that “within a decade no child will go to bed hungry, no family will fear for its next day’s bread, and no human being’s future and capacities will be stunted by malnutrition”.
Robert McNamara, President Kennedy’s former Secretary of Defence, was then head of the World Bank and decided that the Bank’s main focus would be on rural development. For a while much was done and McNamara’s enthusiasm infected many other western aid agencies. But now 30 years later the Bank confesses that its financing for rural areas has fallen from 30% of its total in the early 1980s to 10% today. The proportion of western development aid targeted at the agricultural sector fell from 17% to 3.4%.
What happened? Food prices fell. The market had responded- farmers all over the world planted more. But something else happened too over the next 30 years. Rural incomes did improve. The number of hungry fell- in some countries, such as China, India and many parts of Africa, quite dramatically.
The ’74 shock got governments and aid agencies off their butts, but once things started to move they lost interest. Too many- perhaps some 800 million- are still left behind, out of the loop. This time high food prices and renewed interest by western agencies may give them a helping hand. But for how long?
Copyright © 2007 Jonathan
Power
Last 
Next
Jonathan Power can be
reached by phone +44 7785 351172
and e-mail: JonatPower@aol.com
Jonathan
Power
2007 Book
Conundrums
of Humanity
The Quest for Global Justice
“Conundrums
of Humanity” poses eleven questions for our future progress, ranging
from “Can we diminish War?” to “How far and fast can
we push forward the frontiers of Human Rights?” to “Will
China dominate the century?”
The answers to these questions, the author believes, growing out of
his long experience as a foreign correspondent and columnist for the
International Herald Tribune, are largely positive ones, despite the
hurdles yet to be overcome. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, London, 2007.
William Pfaff, September 17, 2007
Jonathan Power's book "Conundrums" - A Review
"His is a powerful and comprehensive statement of ways to make the world better.
Is that worth the Nobel Prize?
I say, why not?"
Tell a friend about this column by Jonathan Power
Send to:
From:
Message and your name
Get
free articles & updates
|