Taiwan's general elections
could help make a grand Chinese peace
By
Jonathan
Power
TFF
Associate since 1991
Comments directly to
JonatPower@aol.com
March 20, 2008
LONDON - In the Chinese government’s eyes it has two rebellious provinces on its plate - Tibet and Taiwan, and both are in a volatile state. In Tibet protestors are clashing with police and soldiers. In Taiwan there is no occupation but 1000 Chinese missiles are pointed at its heart.
The Tibetans, by and large, no longer try and argue for independence, but even the notion of autonomy is not acceptable to Beijing. In marked contrast, while confronting Taiwan and its significant independence movement, the Chinese offer autonomy as long as Taiwan will accept sovereign rule from Beijing. At the moment, however, there are no takers, neither in the outgoing government of President Chen Shui-bian’s Democratic Progressive Party, which likes to talk about independence and membership of the UN, nor in the opposition party descended from the Nationalists of China, settled by a retreating General Chiang Kai-shek, which for historical reasons has a soft spot for “One China”.
During the eight years of Chen’s rule Taiwan’s China debate has matured at a fast rate. Chen may not have won many converts to his independence line (which is supported by about 30% of the voters) but he has undoubtedly shifted the terms of the debate. He has persuaded the electorate that they must never kow tow to China. At the same time they have been convinced by the opposition that Taiwan should not provoke China.
In broad terms it might seem that this is just the policy of the status quo. Neither independence nor union. In many aspects this is so. But it is not the same status quo as eight years ago - it is both more independent (not independence) minded and more conciliatory.
Looked at this way, assuming the Nationalists’ leader Ma Ying-jeou wins the presidency this week as the polls suggest, the relationship between Beijing and Taipei is becoming not just more mature, but healthier and less confrontational. As Ma says it could go on like this for 50 years before union is seriously discussed. Intellectuals in Taiwan have always hoped for a consensus on a long timetable because by then democracy may have arrived in China itself. Maybe Beijing by then would countenance a loose confederation, rather like Britain had until relatively recently with what it called its “Dominions”, Australia and Canada.
There is much to suggest that in Beijing the tea leaves are being read in a similar way. Despite Chen’s continuous stream of provocative remarks and policy suggestions, President Hu Jintao is as conciliatory as a communist leader can be, much more low key in his approach than his predecessors. At the Party Congress held soon after he came to power he deleted harsh words on Taiwan from his keynote speech. His offer of a peace treaty, although framed within the “One China” policy, has many conciliatory elements. Mr Hu, unlike his predecessors, does not talk of using force.
The next few years are going to be interesting. One can foresee, if Ma is elected, a raft of new measures: direct air links on a permanent daily basis, direct banking links, shipping and freight links, the lowering of trade barriers and a sharp step up of the already hefty rate of Taiwanese investment on the mainland.
In Taiwan there will be more Chinese migrant workers, more tourists and more cultural exchanges (Taiwan, thanks to Chiang Kai-shek, holds in its magnificent museum most of the best of the artefacts of China’s long civilization.) There will undoubtedly be much more Chinese investment, which at the moment is rather rare.
By the time the next election comes around in four years’ time it is possible to conceive of China standing down its threatening missiles, of Taiwan’s and Hong Kong’s democracy being looked at with less hostility in Beijing, and a fast growing prosperity on both sides, fuelled by Taiwan’s high technology and pots of money for investment and China’s willingness to make as many bucks as possible.
It was not that long ago - during the presidency of Bill Clinton - that the U.S. was sending warships to keep the peace in the Straits of Taiwan. Then strategists were writing that if there ever were a new world war Taiwan would be the trigger. Now one should write that Taiwan could be the catalyst for turning the Chinese carnivorous dragon into a vegetarian panda. And maybe having found a peaceful way to deal with Hong Kong and Taiwan Beijing could turn its attention to a policy of peaceful coexistence with Tibet.
Copyright © 2008 Jonathan
Power
Last 
Next
Jonathan Power can be
reached by phone +44 7785 351172
and e-mail: JonatPower@aol.com
Jonathan
Power
2007 Book
Conundrums
of Humanity
The Quest for Global Justice
“Conundrums
of Humanity” poses eleven questions for our future progress, ranging
from “Can we diminish War?” to “How far and fast can
we push forward the frontiers of Human Rights?” to “Will
China dominate the century?”
The answers to these questions, the author believes, growing out of
his long experience as a foreign correspondent and columnist for the
International Herald Tribune, are largely positive ones, despite the
hurdles yet to be overcome. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, London, 2007.
William Pfaff, September 17, 2007
Jonathan Power's book "Conundrums" - A Review
"His is a powerful and comprehensive statement of ways to make the world better.
Is that worth the Nobel Prize?
I say, why not?"
Tell a friend about this column by Jonathan Power
Send to:
From:
Message and your name
Get
free articles & updates
|