Russia, Europe's other half
On Medvedev's idea of a new European
Associate since 1991
Comments directly to
July 21, 2009
LONDON - Subject: Russia, Europe’s other half.
Date: July 21st, 2009.
Read it for yourself, and don’t dismiss it, as most western commentators have. The Pan-European Security Treaty, proposed by Russian president, Dmitri Medvedev, is worth a read. (Here his 2008 prelude to it with 5 basic principles). Doubtless it can be modified, improved and ambiguities removed. But it makes a lot of sense, and it would be another step forwards to what the last Soviet president, Mikhail Gorbachev, urged - the creation of a “European house”, that contains Russia as one of its inhabitants. Only those “with one foot in the Cold War”, to quote President Barack Obama on the eve of his recent visit to Moscow, should find it objectionable.
Indeed, play down Bolshevism and the Cold Wa r- a period of only 70 years in Russia’s long history - it is a thousand years since Prince Vladimir, its ruler, accepted Orthodox Christianity for himself and for his people. The moment Communism, the Cold War and its entire works were over it quickly revived.
It is 500 years since Byzantium Orthodoxy handed over the torch of the Church’s leadership to Russia. When Constantine in AD 326 moved the throne of the Roman emperor to Constantinople and took his newly adopted Church with him the city became the headquarters of the Christian faith and its patriarch. When it was overrun by the Ottomans in 1453 the only place for both the spirit and the headquarters of the Church to move to was Orthodox Russia and the Slavic lands. The “legitimate Church” was now the heritage of Russia. 1453 was also the end of the Roman Empire.
The consequences for Europe have been immense.
The cushion of Orthodoxy in Russia saved Europe from the full impact of the eastern nomads and of Islam. A Muslim Russia would have meant a very different history for the West.
In 1767, the Empress Catherine categorically stated that “Russia is a European state”. In his ambitious study of Europe, Norman Davies wrote that “Fears of the ‘Bear’ did not prevent the growth of a general consensus regarding Russia’s membership of Europe. This was greatly strengthened in the nineteenth century by Russia’s role in the defeat of Napoleon, and by the magnificent flowering of Russian culture in the age of Tolstoy, Tchaikovsky and Chekov.”
Indeed it is clear that when it comes to the proficiency in all the arts Russia has no peer in Europe.
Even in the worst of times under Soviet totalitarian rule many individual Russians, not only Gorbachev, in their heart wanted a European identity - not difficult to believe among those who were conscious of the natural links of their country’s artistic talents and their (repressed) Church. When the communist dictatorship ended it enabled Russians and many of the other peoples of the ex Soviet Union to greet, in Vaclav Havel’s phrase, the “Return to Europe”.
When two years ago I interviewed Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Russian scholar, former National Security advisor and now an unofficial adviser to Hillary Clinton, the U.S. Secretary of State, he told me that “I have given speeches about a Europe that extends from Portugal on the Atlantic to Vladivostok on the Pacific”. But he also added the important caveat, “But when that will happen I don’t know. However, I do know if Ukraine doesn’t move to the West, is prevented from moving, or is excluded from the West, Russia’s involvement with the West will be much more delayed.”
I would add to that point if President Bill Clinton hadn’t pushed through the expansion of NATO and if President George W. Bush junior hadn’t continued the process by breaking a solemn American promise made to Gorbachev not to install NATO military infrastructure in eastern Europe, Moscow would not be so unnerved by Europe and America’s courting of Ukraine. Ukraine would be permitted to enter the EU without much of a serious fuss and Russia itself would have been a big step nearer being considered for entry itself.
At the moment the question of Russia as part of Europe is off the agenda. The issues discussed at the recent Moscow summit are the short term ones - nuclear disarmament, Afghanistan, Iran and Georgia, although we do not know what Obama discussed with Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in private.
But one not too far off day it must be. Brzezinski is prepared to say that in 20 years’ time Russia might be considered for EU membership. There is much to put right before then, not just on the Western side but on Russia’s too.
Nevertheless, Russia wants a peaceful and productive relationship with Europe and the U.S.. That is why we must read and work on Medvedev’s Pan-European Security Treaty. It is a good place to start if one concludes, as I do, that one day Russia must be part of the European Union.
Copyright © 2009 Jonathan
Jonathan Power can be
reached by phone +44 7785 351172
and e-mail: JonatPower@aol.com
The Quest for Global Justice
of Humanity” poses eleven questions for our future progress, ranging
from “Can we diminish War?” to “How far and fast can
we push forward the frontiers of Human Rights?” to “Will
China dominate the century?”
The answers to these questions, the author believes, growing out of
his long experience as a foreign correspondent and columnist for the
International Herald Tribune, are largely positive ones, despite the
hurdles yet to be overcome. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, London, 2007.
William Pfaff, September 17, 2007
Jonathan Power's book "Conundrums" - A Review
"His is a powerful and comprehensive statement of ways to make the world better.
Is that worth the Nobel Prize?
I say, why not?"
Tell a friend about this column by Jonathan Power
Message and your name
free articles & updates