Israeli intransigence ignores history
By
Jonathan
Power
TFF
Associate since 1991
Comments directly to
JonatPower@aol.com
August 9, 2011
There are questions that even today the historians don’t seem moved to investigate. Two important ones come to mind. Why was it that Pharonic Egypt never went to war for hundreds of years until Ramesses 11 became pharaoh in 1303 AD? Isn’t it a fact that Jews in Europe were unmolested for most of the first millennium after the death of Jesus?
The Egyptian question is a bit of an idle curiosity since an answer probably won’t affect our behaviour today, although it should. Still, it is nice to know that we human beings aren’t constituted to make war and that we don’t have to live like we did over hundreds of years in Europe - going to war at the seeming drop of a hat and making the continent the most war-like place on earth.
To learn more about the persecution of the Jews is highly relevant to today’s Palestinian-Israeli struggle for the ancient land of Palestine. The siege mentality that modern Israel exhibits could do with being leavened with a bit of honest history. Jewish history over two thousand years hasn’t always been pogroms. The Holocaust only happened once, although once is one too many.
For most of the time, over two millennia, the Jews in Europe got on with life and were not often persecuted. Indeed, in the first millennium they seemed to have been barely noticed. They may have not been always liked but they were accepted.
Even when, at the beginning of the second millennium, tolerance of the Jews did gradually give way to demonizing them in some quarters, by and large Jews lived on good terms with their Christian neighbours. Then as now they were considered to be materially successful and culturally brilliant.
The influential Christian scholar, St. Anselm, in the 1090s broke from St Augustine’s long held opinion that those who had crucified Christ had not known he was the son of God. Whether this had a profound influence on ordinary opinion can only be guessed at but we do know that in the late eleventh and early twelfth century outrages were perpetuated against Jews, albeit infrequently. During the preparations for the crusade of 1096 Jews were massacred in significant numbers. Yet at the same time there were strong counter currents. Pope Alexander 11 in the decrees of the Third Lateran Council in 1179 wrote that Jews were not to be deprived of land, money or goods and their religious ceremonies should not be interrupted with sticks and stones.
Over the next 750 years the Jews for the most part prospered. Occasionally there were mass killings, but the word “mass” should be kept in proportion - barely was it more than 100 murders at a time, occasionally double that. We should also recall what murderous centuries these were in Europe - wars between kings, dukedoms and knights’ fiefdoms, not to mention the later almost continuous protestant-catholic wars. Compared with these the anti-Jewish pogroms were relatively minor affairs.
In 1791 Catherine the Great of Russia created the Pale of Settlement, territory where permanent Jewish settlement was allowed. Its population was about 5 million, compromising around 40% of the world’s Jewish population. However, Jews in the Pale - which covered about 20% of Russia’s European territory - were still a minority, perhaps 14% of the population. The host community resented this influx of Jews and there were many pogroms and anti-Jewish riots. In the big pogroms of 1891 and 1903 thousands were murdered.
Over two million fled, mainly to the US, but only rarely did they show themselves much interested in the Zionist cause. They were happy where they were and found themselves side by side with other peoples who had also been badly persecuted in Europe. They discovered they weren’t the only ones and this helped give them a sense of perspective that lasted until the Holocaust.
We should not be surprised then that although Zionism was a western construct its greatest appeal was to the remaining East European Jews. West European Jews had found a modus vivendi and their chief concern was not physical oppression. It was the loss of identity through assimilation. What the western Jews cared for was the spiritual redemption of their people. Hence, when Theodor Herzl, the founder of Zionism, preached his cause at the end of the twentieth century he met with much opposition. However, by the later standards of Zionist leaders, Herzl was a moderate man. His urge for a Jewish state was a question of finding a suitable piece of land - it could be in Africa or South America. It did not have to be in Palestine.
Israelis today need to reflect on all this. Apart from Hitler’s Holocaust - a one off event if ever there was one - their forefathers were not singularly persecuted when compared with what else was going on at the time. And until the end of the Second World War popular Jewish opinion, either inside or outside the Middle East, did not countenance a take over of Palestine.
Copyright © 2011 Jonathan
Power
Last 
Next
Jonathan Power can be
reached by phone +44 7785 351172
and e-mail: JonatPower@aol.com
Jonathan
Power
2007 Book
Conundrums
of Humanity
The Quest for Global Justice
“Conundrums
of Humanity” poses eleven questions for our future progress, ranging
from “Can we diminish War?” to “How far and fast can
we push forward the frontiers of Human Rights?” to “Will
China dominate the century?”
The answers to these questions, the author believes, growing out of
his long experience as a foreign correspondent and columnist for the
International Herald Tribune, are largely positive ones, despite the
hurdles yet to be overcome. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, London, 2007.
William Pfaff, September 17, 2007
Jonathan Power's book "Conundrums" - A Review
"His is a powerful and comprehensive statement of ways to make the world better.
Is that worth the Nobel Prize?
I say, why not?"
Tell a friend about this column by Jonathan Power
Send to:
From:
Message and your name
Get
free articles & updates
|