The
Misguided War on Terrorism
By
Kaare Willoch
Former leader of the Conservative Party and Prime
Minister of Norway
November 19, 2003
In recent days newspapers in several countries have
been carrying large ads directed against suicide bombers.
This is unlikely to be of much help. In their summit
talks in London this week, on the future of the war on
terrorism, President Bush and Prime Minister Blair,
should direct their attention towards the root causes of
this dreadful form of warfare.
They should heed the experience of Israel and would
also do well to listen to former US president Bill
Clinton, who, during a recent visit to Oslo, asserted
that "in a world where it is impossible for us to occupy,
capture, or conquer whoever aims to harm us, we need to
work harder to achieve a world with more friends and
fewer terrorists".
Opinion polls demonstrate an urgent need for a new
policy. Over the last two years the percentage of the
population with a favorable view of the USA has fallen
from 61% to 15% in Indonesia and from 52% to 15% in
Turkey.
There is a connection between lack of military power
to confront injustice and the use of terrror. Nuclear
weapons are an element of one party's crushing
superiority in the Middle East. The West - with good
reason - seeks to prevent other countries from acquiring
them.
But the USA refuses to hear criticism of Israel's
nuclear arsenal. On this subject Amir Moussa, leader of
the Arab League, has said that "this is a double standard
which will destroy the war on terrorism."
The two leaders seem to hope that the war against
those behind the September 11, 2001 attack on the USA,
and the removal of Saddam Hussein's terrorist regime in
Iraq, can put an end to such brutal violence. But
according to Ami Ayalon, former head of Israel's security
service Shin Bet, "Those who want 'victory' against
terror without addressing the underlying grievances want
an unending war."
At the New York conference on terrorism in September
of this year, Pakistan's president Pervez Musharaff
mentioned some of these frustrations: "Muslims feel that
their claims are discounted, which leads to a feeling of
hopelessness. This is a direct cause of suicide bombings
and terrorism."
During a recent visit to Oslo former US president Bill
Clinton stated that "in a world where it is impossible
for us to occupy, capture, or conquer whoever aims to
harm us, we need to work harder to achieve a world with
more friends and fewer terrorists." Opinion polls show
failure in this respect. Over the last two years the
percentage of the population with a favorable view of the
USA has fallen from 61% to 15% in Indonesia and from 52%
to 15% in Turkey.
It's said that if one kills two out of ten terrorists,
according to Israeli logic one will have eight left.
According to Palestinian logic the new number will be
twelve. This explains why Lt. Gen. Moshe Yalon, Israeli
Chief of Staff, recently stated that his country's harsh
policy towards the Palestinians was, contrary to its
intentions, strengthening extremists on the Palestinian
side in opposition to its own strategic interests.
This accords with what Thomas L. Friedman wrote in the
New York Times early in 2002: "What Osama Bin Laden
failed to achieve on September 11 is now being unleashed
by the Israeli-Palestinian war in the West Bank: 'a clash
of civilizations.'" But in order to prevent more
disasters, one must also heed Paul Krugman's warning that
"the USA will lose the fight against terror if the
Americans don't make an effort to understand how others
think."
An example of the sort of attitude that exacerbates
conflict is a recent statement by a well-known Norwegian
Christian fundamentalist: "what God proclaimed to the
world through his angel and through Rebekah has indeed
been fulfilled. The Arab people have been like a wild ass
engaged in constant conflict, both among themselves and
with other ethnic groups. They have always been
especially hostile to the Jewish people. "
This type of view is shared by fellow believers in the
West. Others look at the way we Westerners have waged the
bloodiest wars in history amongst ourselves, turning the
entire world into a slaughterhouse. They may wonder, who
are we to view Arabs as having a more "wild-ass"
mentality than our own? And further, it wasn't Arabs but
Europeans who committed one of the most grotesque crimes
of history against the Jewish people. But the racist
attitudes that Christian fundamentalists justify with the
Bible still exert considerable influence on Western
policies.
We should be grateful to the leaders of France and
Germany and almost the entire range of Christian
denominations (with the exception of the leader of the
White House prayer group) who so strongly emphasized that
this war was not a war between religions and was not a
"crusade." If it had not been for them the war in Iraq
would have created even greater risks for an expansion of
conflicts giving rise to terrorism. But, regrettably,
their opposition to the war has not sufficed to eliminate
the perception of an aggressive Western world, a
perception originating with the Crusades and reinforced
every day with television images from Palestine and Iraq.
Paul Krugman wrote in May 2003 in the International
Herald Tribune that "the Iraq war . . . did the
terrorists a favor."
One cannot expect non-Westerners to consider it more a
more heroic act to bomb Palestinian homes from airplanes
than to blow oneself up. And if we're shocked about
suicide bombings, others may note that US-financed
missiles and shells are inflicting a much higher death
toll on innocent civilians. It is only natural that many
outside the West believe that we are against only certain
forms of violence and condone our own use, and our
allies' use, of far more lethal ones.
Some of the new crop of terrorists may also remember
the results that Jewish terrorists achieved when they
drove Palestinians out of areas which would become part
of Israel. Many in the West now believe that the right of
return for those who were driven out is unacceptable,
even if this is what international law demands. In other
words, one is in principle against terrorism giving
results for the terrorist, but makes exceptions when one
has sympathy for him.
The Western leaders must turn their attention to the
root causes of terrorism, and take action to eliminate
them.
Translated by: Jeanie
Shaterian, California
på
norska
©
The author and (IPS
Columnist Service. 17.11.03)

Tell a friend about this article
Send to:
From:
Message and your name
|