The narcissism
of
small differences
in Sweden's elections
By
Jonathan
Power
TFF Associate
since 1991
Comments directly
to JonatPower@aol.com
September 16, 2006
LONDON -
The most successful socialist society on earth goes to the polls on Sunday.
It is not the socialism of Lenin, and certainly not of Mao. Nor, at the
other extreme, is it the New Labour type of Tony Blair. Yet it is the
socialism that the dreamers, thinkers and writers from Voltaire to George
Bernard Shaw to Galbraith always imagined - a successful mix of human
endeavour with human compassion, where the doors of a classless education
are open to everyone, where it is not too difficult to get ahead, where
you can make money, but you have to share it - with those who are not
having it so good today and with yourself at some future age when you
might be ill, infirm, lonely and unemployed. On the other hand, if you
don’t miss a step and you die comfortable you can leave every penny
to your children, and the state won’t demand its cut.
Why then is the coalition of four opposition parties running a close finish
with the incumbent Social Democrats? It’s partly because they have
made clear that they are no longer saying what they said at the last election
when they were trounced, that Sweden was overtaxed - the Swedes know that
in this well administered state you get what you pay for. Tax cuts would
mean hospital cuts, and cuts for one’s ailing mother in the old
people’s home. The conservative-liberal opposition this time has
decided it can’t overthrow socialism - it can just say it will make
it run better. And that is going down with the electorate very well.
Indeed, there are no great issues in this election. The macro economy?
It is hard to knock when Sweden has the highest growth rate per head of
any major country in the industrialised world, when inflation and interest
rates are low, where productivity is high and unemployment is falling.
Sweden’s role in the European Union? Sweden voted to stay out of
the Euro and with its successful growth rate only a few visionaries want
to see another plebiscite.
Europe’s
“big” issues? - the admission of Turkey, the re-writing of
the constitution, free movement of labour for new eastern members - it’s
all a yawn and barely discussed. Membership of NATO? Sweden has long been
against it whilst always secretly cooperating with the U.S. from the days
of the Cold War when it asserted (falsely) it was being monitored by Soviet
submarines to cooperation with the recent programme of rendition.
The
UN? Sweden will always play its part. Immigration? Let them come. The
Swedes pride themselves on not being like Denmark with its rightist anti-immigrant
party. The doors are wide open to all Europeans, and the Poles are happily
flooding in to work at half the Swedish price, but not to put down roots
- they can be home in 90 minutes, courtesy of their low cost airline,
Wizzair.
So perhaps we are left with the narcissism of small differences - like
making an issue out of Prime Minister Göran Persson’s new grand
house. Old time socialists don’t like material ostentation and they
will punish the Social Democrats by staying home on polling day. Nor do
many voters like the way he gives the impression that, as Heidi Avellan,
the editor of the daily, Sydsvenskan, puts it, "being prime minister
is simply a law of nature".
Still, there are lots of smaller issues. Conversations among the politicians
and academics of this university, high tech city where 55% of the voters
have a degree, gives a good feel for what they are. Professor Cecelia
Henning asks, “Why should the state subside jobs to get unemployment
down. Better to encourage entrepreneurship by cutting the taxes on small
businesses”.
Even
in Lund youth unemployment is an issue and voters like the opposition
idea of cutting taxes for the low paid and halving payroll taxes for firms
that take on chronically unemployed youths. And many want to see the upgrading
of schools. “Why can’t we have streaming in the classroom,
as we do with the football teams?”, asks Tove Klette, one of the
leaders of Lund’s opposition liberals
“The trouble with the Social Democrats”, she concludes, “is
that they play on Swedish arrogance and ignorance - that we are simply
the best in the world, even if the streets are dirty and many of the schools
are going downhill. We don’t even look at our neighbour Finland,
even though they have the best schools in Europe. We don’t think
about Iraq. The Social Democrats have bought the people off. We’ve
stopped thinking. If a Swede meets a tiger in the woods he is not frightened
because he thinks if it is allowed in the wood it must be alright!”
Copyright © 2006 By
JONATHAN POWER
I can be reached by
phone +44 7785 351172 and e-mail: JonatPower@aol.com
Get
free articles &
updates
Follow this link to read about - and
order -
Jonathan Power's book written for the
40th
Anniversary of Amnesty International
"Like
Water on Stone - The Story of Amnesty
International"
Här kan du läsa om - och
köpa -
Jonathan Powers bok på svenska
"Som
Droppen Urholkar
Stenen"
Tell a friend about this article
Send to:
From:
Message and your name
 
|